Category Archives: Annual reviews

Linking organisations in the King’s Cross area

At its meeting on 5 December the Forum heard about progress in setting up the proposed neighbourhood forum. This needs to develop enough support throughout its large and diverse area and to determine its approach to neighbourhood planning. In doing … Continue reading

Posted in Annual reviews, Meeting minutes, Neighbourhood planning | Leave a comment

Planning prospects in the King’s Cross area

At its next meeting, on 5 December, the Forum will have: A review of the past year (reported here). A discussion of the intentions for the coming year. The election of the officers for the coming year. The meeting will … Continue reading

Posted in Annual reviews, Neighbourhood planning | Leave a comment

Forum response to Camden about King’s Cross Square

Members of the Forum resolved to respond to the planning applications for King’s Cross Square when they heard from  Network Rail and Transport for London. They had several concerns. In particular, they  thought that the approach to design in and … Continue reading

Posted in Annual reviews, Camden frameworks, Euston Road, King's Cross Square, Meeting minutes, Surrounding developments | 1 Comment

Co-ordinating the plans for King’s Cross Square

At its meeting on 4 November the Forum heard from architects in the Stanton Williams practice, and experts from Network Rail and Transport for London, about the detailed plans for King’s Cross Square. These plans now form the subject of several … Continue reading

Posted in Annual reviews, Camden frameworks, Euston Road, King's Cross Square, Meeting minutes, Neighbourhood planning, Surrounding developments | Leave a comment

Plans for King’s Cross Square

At its next meeting, on 4 November, the Forum will hear from the Network Rail project manager and an architect in the Stanton Williams practice about the plans for King’s Cross Square. The plans have now been submitted in detailed … Continue reading

Posted in Annual reviews, King's Cross Square, Surrounding developments | 2 Comments